Skip to main content

William Ames's Technometry

I have been studying the philosophy and history of education as a hobby intermittently for many years. My interest in the subject just continues to grow as I have the blessing of educating my own children at home.  In the last several years, I have been focusing on reading more Reformed and Puritan authors and collecting evidence of their thoughts on education.

I am currently working through the book "Technometry" by William Ames, with translation and commentary by Lee W. Gibbs.  After I finish typing up my summaries of that book here, I plan to type up my notes from writings on education by Machen and Van Til in the 20th Century, some of the Humanist Reformers in the 16th Century, and other Puritans besides Ames in the 17th Century.

Gibbs calls Ames the "Father of American Theology."  I have found that educational philosophy is inseparable from theology, and every theologian has had something to say about education.  Before progressive modern education, the teaching of children was completely directed by parents and by the church. The necessity of Christians returning to that order is a major theme that I hope will be conspicuous as I work through the theologians and their thoughts about education.  It is a crying shame to leave education to politicians and atheistic pseudoscientists - most modern credentialing authorities and education professors - who pretend they have figured out education for everyone.

  1. Intro Definition of Technometry
  2. Famous Ramus
  3. Humanism
  4. The Puritans, the Moderns, and Classical Christian Education
  5. Technometry: Theses 1-3 - Art
  6. Technometry: Theses 4-8 - The Arts are Ideas
  7. Technometry: Theses 9-21 - Eupraxia and Imitation
  8. Technometry: Theses 22-30 - Arranging Eupraxiae
  9. Technometry: Theses 31-37 - Euprattomenon, or Things Made by the Arts
  10. Technometry: Thesis 38-47 - The Best Known Force of Art
  11. Technometry: Theses 48-60 - Types - Metaphysics?


Comments

  1. AnonymousJune 11, 2020 at 1:55 PM

    Good afternoon, where did you find this book, Technometry? I've only come across it's reference here and in a biography on Jonathan Edwards.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. PuritanClassicalJune 11, 2020 at 2:33 PM

      Hi! Technometry is out of print, but you can still find used copies on Abe Books or on loan from university libraries. It was translated with commentary by Lee W. Gibbs and was published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 1979. You can also read articles about it on JSTOR.

      Delete
    2. PuritanClassicalJune 11, 2020 at 2:44 PM

      I found Technometry after researching Protestant educational movements of the 1600s. What I discovered was that Technometry had a profound impact, especially in America. But its significance was overlooked by historians during the Enlightenment, and that oversight was never rectified - likely due to anti-Puritan biases.

      Delete
    3. AnonymousJune 12, 2020 at 3:14 PM

      Thank you. And absolutely. As far as I'm able to gather from the biography, disdain for God-centered counsel grew in proportion to idolatry of man's capability, especially as Anglicanism and the Enlightenment increased in tandem with each other.

      Thank you for this work, Sister. It is very difficult to find modern assessments for historical gems like this.

      Delete
  2. PuritanClassicalJune 11, 2020 at 7:39 PM

    This may help:
    https://www.jstor.org/stable/2708860?seq=1

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Technometry: Theses 31-37 - Euprattomenon, or the things made by the arts

While on vacation a couple of weeks ago, I visited an unbelieving family member.  He explained to me his belief that humanity moved from riding on horseback 200 years ago, to using smartphones now, because space aliens intervened and gave us secret technological knowledge.  But I've found a better explanation for modern tech than space aliens. Ames' Technometry provides a bridge (one of several, but an important one) from the medieval world to our modern, technologically advanced era.  This section on euprattomenon is the girder of this bridge.  The Puritans were adamant that good works must come from good ideas.  Ames taught that since a rational God created good works, we humans can study His rationality and use that knowledge to create good works.  And beyond basic morality, good works produce good  things.   Puritans encouraged the creation of systems of knowledge so that people could learn concrete bodies of knowledge (science), along with the liberal arts, in as efficie
Post a Comment
Read more

Technometry: Theses 9-21 - Eupraxia and Imitation

Art is the idea of eupraxia . - Technometry, Thesis 1, William Ames Eupraxia means "good action." Specifically, eupraxia is good, principled analysis and acts of creation. Eupraxia is both the object and culmination of the liberal arts.  Each art is an idea that represents something, and as such, it directs action.  An art culminates in a good action - not because the purpose of an art is to rule our behavior, but because that is the nature of an art.  That's just what ideas do. In thesis 15, Ames goes metaphysical and gives his answer to the question of the "one and the many." Lee Gibbs gives a brief explanation of Ames's argument which helped me begin to sort it out.  Ames says that art is one unique and simple act in the being and work of God. But it works out like a refraction of rays from God as many concrete, divisible created things. So the art exercised by man is also refracted and divided.  One God; several liberal arts. There are two part
Post a Comment
Read more

Technometry: Theses 48-60 - Types - Metaphysics?

Ames defines  type as things created and ruled by God or (secondarily) things created or conceived by humans in imitation of God. Type is "that in which all art shines and from which its principles, which produce human understanding, are gathered by man." God creates a thing, and from it shines arts and principles which help us to understand the arts and the thing itself. Then we use the arts to imitatively create and these works of creation bring glory to God. To understand this further, I recommend the illustrations in this article by David Hill Scott: http://www.leaderu.com/aip/docs/scott.html Theses 50-54 deal with metaphysics. Ames attacks scholastic metaphysics and he makes a logical case that the field of metaphysics was overstepping its rightful bounds ("put its sickle into a harvest not its own").  He says that the arts themselves, and by implication his theory of technometry, ought to replace much of metaphysics' stolen ground. He also has a long
Post a Comment
Read more