Skip to main content

Technometry: Theses 1-3 - Art

Technometry,
which adequately circumscribes the Boundaries and the Ends of all the Arts and of every individual Art
- William Ames

The "arts" Ames is discussing are the liberal arts, which include grammar, logic, rhetoric, math, physics, and theology.

His first thesis is that an art is an idea of good action, specifically defined by universal rules.  In thesis three, Ames explains that an art is:
a model to represent an action,
formed in the mind of a person,
before he needs to act,
for the purpose of acting correctly.

Elsewhere he says that art is
the regular disposition or instruction of a thing, in existence and operation, agreeably to its end.
The art of grammar, for example, is a model of action taught to students in order to form in their minds the representation of the right action they should take when reading or writing.  Ames clarifies that an art is not a subject.  For example, the art of grammar is applied to the subject of languages and it may govern actions that include skills like handwriting and publication technology.  But the art of grammar isn't part of the subject of English or Latin.

How can I apply this to my little homeschool experiment?  For the art of grammar for example, I will have to look at the rules that govern the proper translation of communication from one mind to another.  I will need to find examples and types to define the rules and provide practice observing those examples of translation rules while we study languages.  I will need to provide models of true, beautiful, and good words, especially as translations between languages, to fill our imaginations with frameworks to govern our reading and writing.  And that's about all I can come up with, as an uneducated mom who needs to go cook dinner.  If you read this and have any thoughts, please share!  I would love feedback, pushback, or comments of any sort.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

William Ames's Technometry

I have been studying the philosophy and history of education as a hobby intermittently for many years. My interest in the subject just continues to grow as I have the blessing of educating my own children at home.  In the last several years, I have been focusing on reading more Reformed and Puritan authors and collecting evidence of their thoughts on education. I am currently working through the book "Technometry" by William Ames, with translation and commentary by Lee W. Gibbs.  After I finish typing up my summaries of that book here, I plan to type up my notes from writings on education by Machen and Van Til in the 20th Century, some of the Humanist Reformers in the 16th Century, and other Puritans besides Ames in the 17th Century. Gibbs calls Ames the "Father of American Theology."  I have found that educational philosophy is inseparable from theology, and every theologian has had something to say about education.  Before progressive modern education...

Technometry: Theses 31-37 - Euprattomenon, or the things made by the arts

While on vacation a couple of weeks ago, I visited an unbelieving family member.  He explained to me his belief that humanity moved from riding on horseback 200 years ago, to using smartphones now, because space aliens intervened and gave us secret technological knowledge.  But I've found a better explanation for modern tech than space aliens. Ames' Technometry provides a bridge (one of several, but an important one) from the medieval world to our modern, technologically advanced era.  This section on euprattomenon is the girder of this bridge.  The Puritans were adamant that good works must come from good ideas.  Ames taught that since a rational God created good works, we humans can study His rationality and use that knowledge to create good works.  And beyond basic morality, good works produce good  things.   Puritans encouraged the creation of systems of knowledge so that people could learn concrete bodies of knowledge (science), along ...

The Puritans, the Moderns, and Classical Education

Martin Cothran covered this topic a while back. Here is one of his well-researched, but brief, articles about it: https://www.memoriapress.com/articles/classical-education-puritans/ And here is an interesting recent article, not about the Puritans per se, but about the old question of whether we Christians ought to read pagan literature.  The Puritans thought that some was worth reading and some wasn't.  The question I ask when choosing literature is not whether there are bad ideas in the books, but why.  So my kids might read the Communist Manifesto, but not Harry Potter.  Other parents might make different choices, but we have to pray and think about it. https://scholegroups.com/why-read-pagan-literature/ American Christianity took an anti-intellectual turn during the early 20th Century and followed progressives down the modern education path, until the 1950s desegregation of public schools.  Then groups like Abeka and Bob Jones University started ...