Skip to main content

Technometry: Theses 1-3 - Art

Technometry,
which adequately circumscribes the Boundaries and the Ends of all the Arts and of every individual Art
- William Ames

The "arts" Ames is discussing are the liberal arts, which include grammar, logic, rhetoric, math, physics, and theology.

His first thesis is that an art is an idea of good action, specifically defined by universal rules.  In thesis three, Ames explains that an art is:
a model to represent an action,
formed in the mind of a person,
before he needs to act,
for the purpose of acting correctly.

Elsewhere he says that art is
the regular disposition or instruction of a thing, in existence and operation, agreeably to its end.
The art of grammar, for example, is a model of action taught to students in order to form in their minds the representation of the right action they should take when reading or writing.  Ames clarifies that an art is not a subject.  For example, the art of grammar is applied to the subject of languages and it may govern actions that include skills like handwriting and publication technology.  But the art of grammar isn't part of the subject of English or Latin.

How can I apply this to my little homeschool experiment?  For the art of grammar for example, I will have to look at the rules that govern the proper translation of communication from one mind to another.  I will need to find examples and types to define the rules and provide practice observing those examples of translation rules while we study languages.  I will need to provide models of true, beautiful, and good words, especially as translations between languages, to fill our imaginations with frameworks to govern our reading and writing.  And that's about all I can come up with, as an uneducated mom who needs to go cook dinner.  If you read this and have any thoughts, please share!  I would love feedback, pushback, or comments of any sort.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Famous Ramus

Okay so Ramus actually isn't super famous, but maybe he should be. If we are going to study any Puritan educational philosophy, we have to spend time on Peter Ramus. Pierre de la Ram é e was a 16th Century Humanist Protestant.  Even though he had significant disagreements with prominent reformers such as Bullinger and Beza, Ramus was counted as a protestant martyr when he was killed during the St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre.  He had been a student of Johannes Sturm, the "German Cicero" and major reformer of education in Strasbourg.  (Richard Gamble has a fun reading from Sturm in The Great Tradition ).  Apparently, Sturm sparked Ramus' great interest in the study and application of logic.  Ramus, being the orderly, logical mathematician that he was, looked at the Trivium as it was taught in his day, and thought it was disorganized.  In Logic and Rhetoric in England: 1500-1700 , Howell says, As Ramus looked at the scholastic logic, the traditio...
Post a Comment
Read more

William Ames's Technometry

I have been studying the philosophy and history of education as a hobby intermittently for many years. My interest in the subject just continues to grow as I have the blessing of educating my own children at home.  In the last several years, I have been focusing on reading more Reformed and Puritan authors and collecting evidence of their thoughts on education. I am currently working through the book "Technometry" by William Ames, with translation and commentary by Lee W. Gibbs.  After I finish typing up my summaries of that book here, I plan to type up my notes from writings on education by Machen and Van Til in the 20th Century, some of the Humanist Reformers in the 16th Century, and other Puritans besides Ames in the 17th Century. Gibbs calls Ames the "Father of American Theology."  I have found that educational philosophy is inseparable from theology, and every theologian has had something to say about education.  Before progressive modern education...
5 comments
Read more

Technometry: Theses 31-37 - Euprattomenon, or the things made by the arts

While on vacation a couple of weeks ago, I visited an unbelieving family member.  He explained to me his belief that humanity moved from riding on horseback 200 years ago, to using smartphones now, because space aliens intervened and gave us secret technological knowledge.  But I've found a better explanation for modern tech than space aliens. Ames' Technometry provides a bridge (one of several, but an important one) from the medieval world to our modern, technologically advanced era.  This section on euprattomenon is the girder of this bridge.  The Puritans were adamant that good works must come from good ideas.  Ames taught that since a rational God created good works, we humans can study His rationality and use that knowledge to create good works.  And beyond basic morality, good works produce good  things.   Puritans encouraged the creation of systems of knowledge so that people could learn concrete bodies of knowledge (science), along ...
Post a Comment
Read more