Skip to main content

Intro Definition of Technometry

Worldview.  The integration of theology, piety, and work.

I guess those are the concepts closest to technometry that we modern Christians might recognize.

The Puritans of the 17th Century were interested in personal piety and sound, Biblical theology.   They were interested in the whole human - head, heart, and hands.  Technometry was the study of how we give glory to God by studying, via the liberal arts, what He has created and then applying what we learn to all sorts of work.  It was a study of how to apply God's wisdom to every area of life, from farming to politics.  Ames' Technometry was a textbook at Harvard for quite some time and had a wide influence on American philosophy.

David Hill Scott has a good preliminary paper about technometry here.  I recommend reading that to get a general overview of the concept and of Ames' book.

Piety and Christian education are inseparable. In The Liberal Arts Tradition: A Philosophy of Christian Classical Education, Clark and Jain picture Christian education as a tree rooted in piety with a banner of theology over and around it to govern it.  Those familiar with Christian classical education know the concept of ordo amoris, Augustine's description of piety.  If piety is the proper ordering of loves, our current public education system is, as Clark and Jain affirm, "fundamentally impious." 

Via technometry, Puritan intellectuals tied together scholé (truth-seeking) and work (productive vocations) and so touched all spheres of American life with Biblical piety.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

William Ames's Technometry

I have been studying the philosophy and history of education as a hobby intermittently for many years. My interest in the subject just continues to grow as I have the blessing of educating my own children at home.  In the last several years, I have been focusing on reading more Reformed and Puritan authors and collecting evidence of their thoughts on education. I am currently working through the book "Technometry" by William Ames, with translation and commentary by Lee W. Gibbs.  After I finish typing up my summaries of that book here, I plan to type up my notes from writings on education by Machen and Van Til in the 20th Century, some of the Humanist Reformers in the 16th Century, and other Puritans besides Ames in the 17th Century. Gibbs calls Ames the "Father of American Theology."  I have found that educational philosophy is inseparable from theology, and every theologian has had something to say about education.  Before progressive modern education...
5 comments
Read more

Technometry: Theses 22-30 - Arranging Eupraxiae

In theses 22-30 of Technometry, Ames explains his reasoning for listing the eupraxiae , and the liberal arts, in the order that he does.  It's important to note that he doesn't list them in the order in which they ought to be studied, but in order of specialty and dependency.  Some arts cannot exist without other arts.  Some arts become concrete in other arts.  For example, you can't do physics without math.  So Ames lists math before physics because physics depends on math, but math doesn't depend upon physics.  While this implies that we ought to learn math before physics, it becomes a bit more complicated when we look at trivium rather than the quadrivium. Here is Ames's order of the arts and their defined eupraxiae: 1. Logic, for discoursing (arguing and reasoning). 2. Grammar, for speaking. 3. Rhetoric, for communicating. 4. Mathematics (arithmetic and geometry), for measuring. 5. Physics, for doing the work of nature. 6. Theology, for living....
Post a Comment
Read more