Skip to main content

Technometry: Theses 48-60 - Types - Metaphysics?

Ames defines type as things created and ruled by God or (secondarily) things created or conceived by humans in imitation of God. Type is "that in which all art shines and from which its principles, which produce human understanding, are gathered by man."

God creates a thing, and from it shines arts and principles which help us to understand the arts and the thing itself. Then we use the arts to imitatively create and these works of creation bring glory to God. To understand this further, I recommend the illustrations in this article by David Hill Scott:
http://www.leaderu.com/aip/docs/scott.html

Theses 50-54 deal with metaphysics. Ames attacks scholastic metaphysics and he makes a logical case that the field of metaphysics was overstepping its rightful bounds ("put its sickle into a harvest not its own").  He says that the arts themselves, and by implication his theory of technometry, ought to replace much of metaphysics' stolen ground. He also has a long discussion of "being" which I am going to skip because it is over my head.

Thesis 55: back to types.
This type, which we have said is things themselves or being itself, has taken form from all the arts' principles, which not only appear and shine forth around the type but also in it.
Ames illustrates how we get the liberal arts from God's creation (theses 56-60).
  1. The principles of discoursing (logic) are collected via reason and affection directly to our understanding from the reason, relation, and mutual affection of things themselves. What is the order of things? What principles govern how we answer that question?
  2. The principles of speaking and communicating (grammar and rhetoric) are comprehended from words that mediate between things and the reason, relation, and mutual affection of them. Which words are used to understand and help others understand things? What principles govern how we answer that question?
  3. The principles of measuring (mathematics) are seen in the quantity of the types that are made from matter. Of material things, how are they measured and what principles govern how we measure?
  4. The principles of the natures of things (physics) are seen in the types themselves because they differ in form. How do things differ in form from other things? What principles govern how we describe the natures of things?
  5. The principles of living (theology) are seen in the ends of the types. The end is that which all things look toward, which is universal goodness. Here Ames quotes Plato, saying that things shoot forward "with the greatest piety to the contemplation and worship of God." What is the ultimate purpose of created things? What principles determine how we find the answer to this question?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

William Ames's Technometry

I have been studying the philosophy and history of education as a hobby intermittently for many years. My interest in the subject just continues to grow as I have the blessing of educating my own children at home.  In the last several years, I have been focusing on reading more Reformed and Puritan authors and collecting evidence of their thoughts on education. I am currently working through the book "Technometry" by William Ames, with translation and commentary by Lee W. Gibbs.  After I finish typing up my summaries of that book here, I plan to type up my notes from writings on education by Machen and Van Til in the 20th Century, some of the Humanist Reformers in the 16th Century, and other Puritans besides Ames in the 17th Century. Gibbs calls Ames the "Father of American Theology."  I have found that educational philosophy is inseparable from theology, and every theologian has had something to say about education.  Before progressive modern education...
5 comments
Read more

Technometry: Theses 22-30 - Arranging Eupraxiae

In theses 22-30 of Technometry, Ames explains his reasoning for listing the eupraxiae , and the liberal arts, in the order that he does.  It's important to note that he doesn't list them in the order in which they ought to be studied, but in order of specialty and dependency.  Some arts cannot exist without other arts.  Some arts become concrete in other arts.  For example, you can't do physics without math.  So Ames lists math before physics because physics depends on math, but math doesn't depend upon physics.  While this implies that we ought to learn math before physics, it becomes a bit more complicated when we look at trivium rather than the quadrivium. Here is Ames's order of the arts and their defined eupraxiae: 1. Logic, for discoursing (arguing and reasoning). 2. Grammar, for speaking. 3. Rhetoric, for communicating. 4. Mathematics (arithmetic and geometry), for measuring. 5. Physics, for doing the work of nature. 6. Theology, for living....
Post a Comment
Read more

Intro Definition of Technometry

Worldview.  The integration of theology, piety, and work. I guess those are the concepts closest to technometry that we modern Christians might recognize. The Puritans of the 17th Century were interested in personal piety and sound, Biblical theology.   They were interested in the whole human - head, heart, and hands.  Technometry was the study of how we give glory to God by studying, via the liberal arts, what He has created and then applying what we learn to all sorts of work.  It was a study of how to apply God's wisdom to every area of life, from farming to politics.  Ames' Technometry was a textbook at Harvard for quite some time and had a wide influence on American philosophy. David Hill Scott has a good preliminary paper about technometry here .  I recommend reading that to get a general overview of the concept and of Ames' book. Piety and Christian education are inseparable. In The Liberal Arts Tradition: A Philosophy of Christian Class...
Post a Comment
Read more